Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Man Enough?


Esquire Magazine presented this month "The 75 Books Every Man Should Read:
An unranked, incomplete, utterly biased list of the greatest works of literature ever published" -- by men, that is; only one book on this list is by a woman (Flannery O'Connor's A Good Man Is Hard to Find).  
See the entire list here. 

How many have you read?

What books are missing from this list?

Also check out Esquire's other "Man" lists:


Monday, May 30, 2011

"The Case—Please Hear Me Out—Against the Em Dash: Modern prose doesn't need anymore —seriously."

Over at Slate.com, Noreen Malone calls the by-writers-beloved and famously overused m-dash into question, attempting to hammer down some sharper parameters of usage:

Emily Dickinson
According to the Associated Press StylebookSlate's bible for all things punctuation- and grammar-related—there are two main prose uses—the abrupt change and the series within a phrase—for the em dash. The guide does not explicitly say that writers can use the dash in lieu of properly crafting sentences, or instead of a comma or a parenthetical or a colon—and yet in practical usage, we do. A lot—or so I have observed lately. America's finest prose—in blogs, magazines, newspapers, or novels—is littered with so many dashes among the dots it's as if the language is signaling distress in Morse code.


What's the matter with an em dash or two, you ask?—or so I like to imagine. What's not to like about a sentence that explores in full all the punctuational options—sometimes a dash, sometimes an ellipsis, sometimes a nice semicolon at just the right moment—in order to seem more complex and syntactically interesting, to reach its full potential? Doesn't a dash—if done right—let the writer maintain an elegant, sinewy flow to her sentences?


Nope—or that's my take, anyway. Now, I'm the first to admit—before you Google and shame me with a thousand examples in the comments—that I'm no saint when it comes to the em dash. I never met a sentence I didn't want to make just a bit longer—and so the dash is my embarrassing best friend. When the New York Times' associate managing editor for standards—Philip B. Corbett, for the record—wrote a blog post scolding Times writers for overusing the dash (as many as five dashes snuck their way into a single 3.5-paragraph story on A1, to his horror), an old friend from my college newspaper emailed it to me. "Reminded me of our battles over long dashes," he wrote—and, to tell the truth, I wasn't on the anti-dash side back then. But as I've read and written more in the ensuing years, my reliance on the dash has come to feel like a pack-a-day cigarette habit—I know it makes me look and sound and feel terrible—and so I'm trying to quit.


The problem with the dash—as you may have noticed!—is that it discourages truly efficient writing. It also—and this might be its worst sin—disrupts the flow of a sentence. Don't you find it annoying—and you can tell me if you do, I won't be hurt—when a writer inserts a thought into the midst of another one that's not yet complete? Strunk and White—who must always be mentioned in articles such as this one—counsel against overusing the dash as well: "Use a dash only when a more common mark of punctuation seems inadequate." Who are we, we modern writers, to pass judgment—and with such shocking frequency—on these more simple forms of punctuation—the workmanlike comma, the stalwart colon, the taken-for-granted period? (One colleague—arguing strenuously that certain occasions call for the dash instead of other punctuation, for purposes of tone—told me he thinks of the parenthesis as a whisper, and the dash as a way of calling attention to a phrase. As for what I think of his observation—well, consider how I have chosen to offset it.)


. . . To read the rest of this article, click here.

Friday, May 6, 2011

Nancy Mitchell Wins Pushcart Prize

NANCY MITCHELL WINS PUSHCART PRIZE, SELECTED FROM JOHNSON STATE COLLEGE’S JOURNAL, GREEN MOUNTAINS REVIEW

Poet Nancy Mitchell, who visited JSC in the fall of 2010, was awarded a Pushcart Prize for her poem "Grace Notes," which appeared in Green Mountains Review.

Mitchell’s poem will be included in The Pushcart Prize XXVI: Best of the Small Presses (2012).  The Pushcart Prize recognizes excellence in writing, in addition to editing and publishing  by small presses nationwide.  An anthology that is published every year, The Pushcart Prize: Best of Small Presses  is frequently used at many colleges and universities as a creative writing textbook.  In addition to having her worked honored and published, Nancy Mitchell will be appointed to the editorial board for all future editions.

Mitchell teaches Creative Writing at Salisbury University in Maryland.  She is the author of two books of poems The Near Surround (2002) and Grief Hut (2009). Her poems have appeared in Agni, Poetry Daily, Salt Hill Journal, Great River Review, and elsewhere.

Professor Elizabeth Powell, Editor of Green Mountains Review,  notes: “We are delighted and grateful for this recognition of excellence. Nancy Mitchell is a poet of our times, working at the height of her imaginative and technical powers. We are both proud and lucky to publish her work.”  Professor Jacob White, also an Editor at Green Mountains Review, adds: “It is especially gratifying to see a poet recognized for work that is so humble yet so deeply inhabited, so honest.”

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Literary Magazine Reviews: Part 2

Below is Part 2 of our literary magazine review series, provided as way to help writers find the right place to submit their work.  The reviews below come from student writers in Jacob White's Thursday night Fiction Workshop.


The Indiana Review
Reviewed by Jasmine Ohadi

The Indiana Review publishes fiction, poetry, and prose. They focus on rich imagery, mystery, and most of the works published are a bit dark and edgy. They have many down to earth pieces, knitted with solid juxtaposition that is alluring. The work is formatted artistically; this literary journal is focused on a younger audience; it is contemporary, free style, less conservative form of writing. It has a sense of House of Leaves aura and it works well altogether; each piece is a part of the whole, carefully designed to create that aura. Naturally, judges for some of Indiana’s contests are Stuart Dybek, Samantha Lan Chang, and Natasha Tretheway.
“Obit” by Ted Sanders beautifully is placed close to the middle of the book. It is also formatted with small margins, taking the shape of a glass at the beginning of the page. It works because it begins with: “The boy who falls asleep to the story of bear will grow old and wordlessly die. In the end, he will die across his pancakes,”—juxtaposition—“coughing up blood in a restaurant in a distant town, blood freckling the arms and throat of his latest wife, the table, the dark stone floor, where bright ice and dark water from his spilled glass will also fall.” This all is knitted carefully in elegant symmetry. This story follows this omniscient voice and changes it margins, sometimes closing into two, and merging together as the story progresses and climaxes. It is a prose and a fiction.  Each sentence is beautiful, example: “The man believed at that moment that he would remember this sight of her: the sun across her skin, falling between her just-open lips where a fine mindless shape was curling, her skin lit and blooming, her carved arms raised around her head like a harp’s arms, as if the delicate gesture unfolding through them were being sung wordlessly”—many words are repetitive like ‘wordlessly’—“into sight in her face. The woman will survive this understanding.”
A story that perceives the mystery well, by pace and unfolding, and generates the reader’s treasure for their words and gestures is “Railway Killers” by Anthony Farrington. He does this by creating a murder story and a mysterious 1st person narrator. The suspense and drama is played by this man’s personality: “I took little stock in rumors. Each murder was an unknowable story; each story had numerous victims. For example, it was rumored that my ex-wife was in love again. Fact: there is nothing new here. Fingers twirl…..rumor had it, someone wanted to murder me. Fact is, it’s a funny story.” The narrator reveals his mystery elegantly, taking time, until it is revealed that he may in fact be the murder himself, but the reader still doesn’t know that: “We are all failures at love, but not at falling in love. Assasins and victims. I like certain words. Quagmire. But if you get stuck in them, my suggestion is this: hold completely still. There are no heros here. No crime fighters…you’ll never escape. And the more you struggle, the more you’ll sink. But even under the most incriminating stares of everyone you meet, the rumors—“You’re guilty. Guilty.”—remember, you have the right to remain silent.” This narrator is obviously in a conflict with himself during the story, and it is not resolved which makes it even more appealing. The format of this story is also artistic.  For example:
“(((((((((wish))))))))))
I want to come
under the cover of darkness.
I’ll be your accomplice
an accessory to whatever crime
And the sound of it—wish—hitting me in waves and waves.
Rumor: Dee loves me.
Rumor: I destroyed their marriage.
Rumor: my ex-wife is taking antidepressants.
Rumor: my children don’t want to live with me anymore.




Notre Dame Review
Reviewed by Micheala Smith

            If I had to take a guess at what the editors at Notre Dame Review are looking for in their fiction submissions I would say they are submissions that work to provide a high quality literary presence. These are works that are highly controlled. The editors are also looking for stories that haven’t been told before. The pieces I read were unique I haven’t read stories that had a similar story line or even a similar theme. They are looking for work that is free of cliques in the language of the actual story. The beginnings of the story are strong and clear. The endings knew how to wrap the story up without presenting it as a package. The characters are developed with a clear sense of who they are. The details draw you in to the worlds being presented. The editors are searching for something they haven't seen on their desk eighty times over. I would suggest submitting here if you think your work in unique, highly defined within the world, and well controlled.


Black Warrior Review
Reviewed by Andrew Coffey

Black Warrior Review is a magazine that publishes very enticing and engaging fiction, but the stories are usually more on the darker side of things.  I read the short story “We All Go Through It”  by Jamey Bradbury.  This story used third person omniscience to take on the perspectives of a classroom of children.  In the story, a classmate disappears from the class and they are never told why, and everything goes on as normal.  The children walk by the missing child’s house every day and see the car in the driveway and begin to question what happened to him.  The children also start to note suspicious behavior from their teacher as the year progresses, as she no longer notices the notes being passed, but just stares at the chid’s empty desk.  The only empty desk in the classroom.  Soon thereafter, a new kid moves into the seat in class, but the teacher still stares at the desk like it’s empty.  Since it’s from a child’s perspective, the story incorporated immersive lines like ‘Jimmy said the smell on her breath was gin, whatever that was.’  In the end, the teacher ends up getting replaced, and the new teacher does nothing relatively similar to their old teacher, and the children are just expected to move on with the unfamiliar like it’s not there.  The children end up taking out their frustrations on the new kid out at recess as they all begin to throw rocks and lunch-boxes at the boy and tell him to not come back.  One of the best lines is in relation to the first toss, “no one threw it; we all threw it.”
            I read another interesting prose story called “Mule Hour” by Terrance Hayes.  One of the most impelling lines in the story is “Ma and me ride a blue mule until its dumb heart gives out. She grips its tail and I its ears and we drag it to the side of the road like a bag of garbage on trash day, its muscles soft as cushion and its bones soft too like coil gone lazy in a couch, and we leave it burning with all the humanity fire strips away.”  I think that about sums it up.  Dark, but engaging, vivid and concrete fiction that ‘grabs you by the lapels’ right from the beginning. 


Epoch
Reviewed by Liz Spier

Epoch boasts a handful of short fiction that continues in the way of expanding the boundaries of the short story, as well as expressing new ideas. Many reviews for the magazine call it “some of the best short fiction,” and a “journal that has earned its way into the importance of literary history.”
            Epoch proclaims itself as an “eclectic collection of short fiction” and goes on to say that they do not publish criticism or reviews of fiction to keep the magazine clean and imaginative.
            When reviewing the editorial staff of the magazine, the reader may find that they have a preference for the odd, for the experimentation with syntax and language, and are looking for the story to linger in your mind for hours. Many of the short stories published are vignettes, or slice of life stories, in which the characters may not progress very far, or, if they do, progress in a manner that almost seems like digression. I can honestly say that each piece was interesting and full of delightful language and vocabulary, but the majority left the reader mildly sad, or at least with a depressing calm.


The Southern Review
Reviewed by Chelsea Sicely                                                                                                  

            Upon reading “Overpass,” my first impression was that The Southern Review was “southern” in value. Because the short story mentions god and the belief (and even though it did seem a little more “raw” and less “sophisticated”), I had the impression that every story would be southern-inspired (such as gumbo, fried chicken and church).  
            I then read the submission directly after that. A short poem titled “My wife and I learn to accept our clutter.”  This poem was about a couple who were messy, but content with that life.
            The poem snuffed my first assumption. Quickly browsing through the rest of the book, I found it was a mixture of short stories, poems, art, and “reflective” essays? Curiosity got the better of me and I googled it. Taken from their page, “About us”:  The Southern Review publishes fiction, poetry, critical essays, interviews, book reviews, and excerpts from novels in progress, with emphasis on contemporary literature in the United States and abroad.”
            I didn’t see any interviews and was surprised that they published “book reviews”; I imagine every issue is different and does not have the same number of poems, or novels, per each publication.


Bat City Review
Reviewed by Taylor Shaw

Bat City Review seems to have a wide variety of fiction pieces. There does not seem to be a specific style that draws the attention of the Editors of this particular magazine, or form. The two pieces I read from the magazine were both approximately page and a half, first-person narratives that showed two different looks into the human psyche. The first, “The Engagement,” is about a man who spends his life selling woman’s wear out of his own shop, hates it (for a reason he himself cannot explain), and ends up torching his shop out of frustration with it. The next, “Hollow Bones” is about a man constructing a bird skeleton out of a bio book for a medical degree while his girlfriend is upstairs painting nudes. He contemplates flight, the physiology of the birds, and connects it to his own relationship. But at a quick glance, there are also third-person narratives of much larger length that, at a quick glance, offer different sets of characters and dynamics than the ones I read. Their only requirement, based off of their submission guidelines and they want their submissions to make them ecstatic to read their work and they want quality writing, which seems extremely apparent through the diverse lengths and styles that I looked at by skimming through the journal.

Alaska Quarterly Review
Reviewed by Justin Little

            The first article I read in the AQR was a non-fiction piece named “The Last Time,” by Margaret MacInnis. This was a very serious story for Ms. MacInnis, who recorded her memories of her parent’s divorce in those pages. The story’s uniqueness comes from its chapter structure; each chapter details a memory of the last time she shared some experience with her father, whether it is overhearing both sides of an argument or being threatened with a smack across the face. As one might guess, the father really was a terrible husband and parent all-around, unable to even articulate why he did not get along with Margaret’s mother. Despite all his wickedness, though, he comes off as a pathetic and distressingly human individual, and Margaret cannot help but show sympathy for him. Like many stories, its villain carries its narrative, and the terrible father is serviceable in this regard. Saying the abusive parent is a cliché only cements how depressingly common such people can be.
            The other story I chose to study, “Box of Light” by Warren Slessinger, is similarly depressing. This purely fictional account also details a divorce, but this time it is from the man’s perspective. This man has a sympathetic reason for his breakup, though; he is simply so traumatized by his time spent as a soldier that he is incapable of forming a mundane romantic relationship. He currently works in a cubicle for some generic white-collar company, which he considers his “box of light” because it gives him clear objectives, gives his post-army life some meaning. He also was an accomplice in a cold-blooded murder, but that’s neither here nor there. The story ends with the man unable to sleep, fantasizing about enemy combatants bringing a siege to his house just so he could be back in combat, where he belongs. The story of a broken, shell-shocked soldier is at least as old as All Quiet on the Western Front, and “Box of Light” does very little to bring anything new to the table.
            In all, the feeling I get reading the AQR is a feeling of dead seriousness. The Alaska Quarterly Review has no room for jokes among its thought-provoking articles. Of course, there are a few duds among its bleak fiction, but sometimes magazines have “off” issues.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Literary Magazine Reviews: Part 1

As JSC Creative Writing students rewrite and revise the short stories, poems, and essays they've been working on all year, some are beginning to think about sending their work out to literary journals for possible publication.

The world of literary journals is a vast one (you'll find a fairly comprehensive list of the literary journals out there, with links to their sites, on NewPages.com).  Yet, as a way to help connect writers with journals that fit them best, this blog will begin to feature a multi-part series of literary journal reviews by current JSC writers.

The first batch, below, comes from students in Jacob White's Monday night fiction workshop.


The Iowa Review
Reviewed by Victoria Von Hessert
           
The first story I read from this publication, “In the Dark” by Tricia Springstubb, was the 2009 winner of The Iowa Review fiction award.  It is something of a coming-of-age story in which the narrator recounts her love affair with a boy headed off to college, her alcoholic, but well-intentioned if out-of-touch father, and the night wanderings of her mother.  Her mother spends her evenings exploring the homes of her neighbors, only to be confronted one night by the wife of a policeman carrying his gun.  We never really find out for sure if it is the narrator’s mother whom the wife shoots at (and misses) but the “prowler’s” night activity ceases after the encounter.  Ultimately, the narrator loses her virginity to Dave, her father to cirrhosis, and her mother to heart disease, but it is her relationship to her mother that she adheres to and tries to reclaim at the end. 
            The second story, “The McGugle Account” by Sharma Shields, recounts the narrator’s work at a PR firm and her brief love affair with an unusual coworker, a Cyclops.   He is a lover of Proust, whom she pretends to have read but hasn’t.  Ultimately, he is fired for murdering the entire McGugle clan, clients of the firm, and eating them.  The narrator later receives a crate full of Proust with a note that provides her with an enduring insight into her own self, both the lies she tells and her goodness.
            Based on these two stories, I would say The Iowa Review is primarily a publisher of “serious” fiction, although certainly open to the slightly offbeat, as evidenced by the Cyclops story.  I don’t think I’d call this experimental in any way, but really more of an openness to publishing authors who explore some deeper issues of human nature with slightly unconventional stories or characters.


Gulf Coast
Reviewed by Andrew Ledbetter

I read fiction pieces from Gulf Coast journal of literature and fine arts. This included three works by one author, that I guess could be considered flash fiction, but as they shared similar themes and were focused on daily family life with a new child, they seemed almost like chapters than individual stories. They mirrored Abbott Awaits by Chris Bachelder, but were much simpler. These were written by Christopher Merkner, and their length did not exceed two pages each. I found another flash fiction piece just after that was even shorter, and it was merely about taking a drug I believe and walking around town. There is a relationship depicted in this short work, but it is only barely exposed to the reader. The piece has moments of stream of consciousness, but because of its length does not really capture anything except the blur of moving around a town.
I also read a story called “The Naked Hours,” which was like twelve pages long. This is a story of a brother and sister, who are not blood related, but despite that get into a sexual relationship. This helped me better understand what the editors might be looking for. The literary journal is mostly compiled of poetry, but in all the fiction I found a similar theme. Relationships seem to be their point of interest; because there is something complex in relationships that are hard to define, yet when done well can captivate readers. Most people have relationships at some point that are weird or complex, and this is what can be exciting about reading about them. The reader can draw from personal experiences to feel more a part in the story than just a reader. It is a puzzle of how morals and conventions fit together to form either a love story, but in these cases it ranges on experiences of sexuality.
This literary journal publishes realistic fiction, meaning not sci-fi, or horror, but stories of realistic relationships.


Glimmer Train Stories
Reviewed by Crysty Boucher

            The first story I read was “Silenced Voiced: Liu Xiaobo” by Sara Whyatt. This was a non-fiction story which begins with a Czech playwright and the former president of his country trying to deliver a letter to the embassy in China and not succeeding. He is trying to free a fellow writer and anti-communist activist. The story continues with the history of both of the playwrights and their political connection and goals. To finish, the story gives an address which readers can write to in order to help try and free Liu Xiaobo.
            The second piece I skimmed through only, as it turned out to be another non-fiction article. It was called “Interview with Nam Le” by Jennifer Levasseur and Kevin Rabalais. It was specifically what the title claimed: an interview with the award-winning writer Nam Le concerning his literary works.
            The third story I chose was a first person limited point of view story called “The Grief Ministry” by Matthew Salesses. This story concerns a man, Carl, who, after the loss of his wife and daughter, created a church program called the Grief Ministry. He is praying for guidance when his next door neighbor, Ed, someone who has helped him through the grieving process, informs him that Ed’s wife, Gertie is dying of cancer. When she dies, Carl tries to use Ministry protocol to help Ed and finds that it isn’t helping. Ed drives a car through Carl’s living room instead. When Carl finds Ed, Ed is digging in the front yard, intent on burying Gertie, instead of having the funeral his daughter had planned out. The daughter and father grief in the front yard after a fight concerning the wife; they ignore Carl as he tries to get an answer as to whether Ed drove his car through the living room. Finally, Carl goes home, realizing that his work with the Ministry hadn’t been the selfless helping of people through the years which he always thought it was. It was his way of saying “Look at me. My family died. Pay attention to me.” He climbs into Ed’s car and drives it further into the living room.
            Glimmer Train appears to be a literary magazine which accepts well-written stories of fiction, stories of non-fiction, and articles concerning writers. It feels like this journal would appeal to writers and readers who are interested in emotional stories, but also readers and writers who are interested in their peers in the literary world. I would need to read more stories to understand fully what the direction is that this journal favors; however, I get the feeling that it is a magazine which is on “the cutting edge” of writing, with an eclectic sampling of many styles and even genres.


The Southern Review
Reviewed by Doug Bliss

            I read the summer 2010 issue of The Southern Review, specifically three fiction pieces:  “The Singers,” by Rick Bass; “Miss Indian Chicago,” by Susan Power; and “Koi,” by Edward Falco.  All three authors are previously published and established—Rick Bass, in particular, is well known and widely published.  The Bass and Power stories were solidly conventional in their construction, the Falco piece was short and lyrical.  To summarize:
            “The Singers” is excerpted from Nashville Chrome.  The excerpt—told in third person limited, past tense—takes place during lunchtime at a rural sawmill.  The sawmill’s owner insists that the saw blades be sharpened and tuned every day after lunch.  He uses his children, who have the gift of perfect pitch, to determine whether or not a blade is properly tuned by listening for a particular frequency as the blade is spun on an arbor.
            “Miss Indian Chicago” is a short story told in first person, past tense.  The story follows Jude Reynolds, a teenage Potawatomi girl in 1971 Chicago, as she attends ceremonial Native American dance competitions in a quest to seduce young braves and “…screw herself Indian.”  Jude, the product of a white father and an Indian mother,  is confused about her identity and her mother, who “…slept herself white.”  The story outlines several failed seductions and ends with Jude coming to terms with her heritage.
            “Koi” is a super-short story—almost a still life—of a blue heron catching a koi from a backyard pond as an old woman watches from her wheelchair.  The episode presents an opportunity for reflection on her late husband and their life together, ending with the heron flying off with the fish.
            My sense of the “editorial personality” of The Southern Review is one of semi-conventionality.  The stories, even though one is excerpted and one is wicked short, seem to have beginning, middle, and end.  They are structured in a way that I can understand and am comfortable with—I don’t detect any attempt to have a “conversation” with any cutting edge component of the literary world—which suits me just fine. 


Mid-American Review
Reviewed by Steph Girard

The Mid-American Review is the sort of literary Journal that seems to be “Happy-go-lucky,” with a mix of a darker image hidden. I loved it. What that means is that the fiction stories in it are nothing like I’ve ever read before, and it actually surprises me that stories like these actually got published.  They are not genre fiction, and are very short. Roughly being about four to ten pages each. One of the stories is about a man who joins a place called the “Ministry of Laughter” and what that is, is a place where all jokes are created. Outside sources, who are known as storytellers, get captured to work for the ministry. People who work here have to destroy all connections to their previous life, (a letter is sent to the family stating that the new worker died in a factory fire and no body was found) and give their full attention to their new jobs. The story is richly filled with details, and leaves the reader curious about where the story is going to take them next. I recommend submitting to this review if one, you are not a genre fiction writer, and two, have writing with a darker undertone blended into it.



The Gettysburg Review
Reviewed by Nicole Dumaine

The Gettysburg Review is a journal that appears to focus in on poetry, essays, and novella. There is only one short story, a novella, which counts in at fifty-four pages. The novella, “Summer Avenue” is in first person point of view about owning a trailer park around Memphis: “My granddad started this trailer part sixty years ago, and for a while it was a classy place” (521 Schottenfeld). The story talks about how “I” took over the place, what it has become, and what it hopefully will be like under his ownership. The poems throughout this journal focus in on the quirky thoughts of characters: “At forty, I peel away the first layer/ of bark where gray and kidney-bean red rings/ of my addictions move like inner tubes down a conveyor/belt. I strip off the next layer and hold it to the light” (530 “How about Daphne”). Another peculiar concern of the character comes from the poem “You can never step into the same aubade”: “There’s a spot behind where I stand/wanting a cigarette, to roll tobacco in paper/ and light it with a wooden math / a I did a century ago / three or four times a day, / where if you kneel and lick dew / from grass, it tastes / sweet, like the inside wrapper / from a Tootsie Pop” (584).


Black Warrior Review
Reviewed by Benjamin Algar

            Philip Tate’s story “Dam,” featured in the Black Warrior Review Spring/Summer 2011 )issue, deals with the mysteries of a dirty, muddy river that claims innocent victims of drowning every year.  The protagonist in Tate’s story is a misunderstood boy named Boyd; the antagonists are a group of four girls who are swimming in the grimy river.  Boyd tries to impress the girls by proving to them that he knows who they all are, that he has a new scooter on top of the hill, and that he can swim even with his jeans still on.  Boyd is presented in a lowbrow fashion, his grammar is flawed and his cognitive response to insults is pathetic.  We watch as the girls humiliate Boyd for being pathetically moronic, and perverted.  They call him names, which he resents, but seems to absorb as if he’s been used to it.  Towards the ending of the story Body has visions of both saving the girls from the drowning, and watching them being picked out of the water after having drowned.  The story ends with the girls speeding by while he’s riding his scooter, and after the dust cloud from the girl’s car settles Boyd envisions swimming in the grimy water, swimming elegantly like the girls had just ten minutes earlier.
            Tate writes with a lot of very poetic and lyrical descriptions.  He is very in tune with nature, the nature of the environment and the nature of teenagers.  The stories narrative is develops nicely inside of the grounding specifics of the natural habitat that the teenagers inhabit (i.e. the river bank and the tall elm tree.)  The editorial staff seems to enjoy a plot that involves a strong sense of realism, specific and lyrical descriptions, and quick plot development.  The lyrical style that Tate’s story uses is so well done; the specifics are repeated in order to remind the reader of the world’s legitimacy.  Again, it seems like, in my opinion, that the Black Warrior Review editorial staff prefers highly lyrical, yet grounded works of fiction, which, in the case of Tate’s story, sheds light on issues that are prevalent for our generation.

            Aaron Kunin”s “Cumulative portrait. Or overdrawn characters. Or buyer’s remorse,” is a highly lyrical, Dybekian story that reuses the term “some” when describing a stereotype of people that are likely to do as Kunin suggests.  Kunin’s work of fiction fails to stand alone as a work of fiction.  Basically Kunin makes authoritatively specific and in-depth assumptions about a group of individuals that he is stereotyping.  In every paragraph, there are thirty-six in all, Kunin describes the affect that money has on a certain demographic of money spenders, savers, or stealers.  It’s all very funny and somewhat lighthearted, yet, again, it is not fiction.  Some paragraphs consisted of a single sentence, while other paragraphs consist of three or four.  It varies on how specific Kunin wants to be.  On the whole, Kunin’s work of fiction seems to be acting like a work of nonfiction, an observational piece, grounded in specifics and lyricized or meant to be sung.
            This selection confuses me the most, out of the entire short fiction feature in this literary magazine.  It doesn’t involve conflict; it tells and does not show, there’s not complex plot or dynamic characters.  The people involved are casted as shadows from the beginning and tend to, throughout the story, build up a stereotype that Kunin is shooting for.  This tells me that the Black Warrior Review editorial staff looks for works that challenge the art of fiction, that contain highly lyricized works of fiction, and that work well because of the author’s tonal personality and great syntax.


Epoch
Reviewed by Liz Glasser

The literary magazine I read is called Epoch and it is published three times a year by Cornell University. This magazine seems to focus more on the fiction pieces with eight pieces of fiction, one essay and three pieces of poetry. The pieces were on average about twenty pages long. However, one was three pages and the longest was twenty-six pages. So they don’t seem to care about length but more about the quality. . I read through some of the magazine’s fiction pieces and noticed that all of them were regular fiction pieces, there were no fantasy pieces or anything that couldn’t have been believable in real life. So if you write fiction pieces where nothing crazy happens and that could be just another day in the life piece, Epoch is the magazine for you to submit to.


The Paris Review
Reviewed by Lit Tyler

The Paris Review was founded in Paris, in the 1950's, by American expatriates, with what was felt by the editors to be a rather daring goal: to publish moving and relevant contemporary fiction and poetry in a climate that was less than enthusiastic about such things.  In the course of the past 1/2 century, the Paris Review (now headquartered in New York) has stayed at least true enough to this mission to have published original fiction by Jack Kerouac, Dennis Johnson, Joseph Heller, and David Foster Wallace, to name a few.  (The magazine also scores some heavy-hitters for its interviews).
The three stories and one interview that I read from the Fall 2010 issue very much seemed consistent with the Paris Review editorial self image.  The stories are (mostly) tightly written and deal with material of contemporary interest: a marriage imploding under the weight of its own baggage, a hapless junkie and his ambitions, and a playful fictionalization of a great author's life.  And, surprisingly, I found the interview, especially, (subject: the mesmerizingly pretentious Michel Houellebecq) to be a very strange and interesting read.

"Art of Fiction #206"
An interview with Michel Houellebecq, a provocative and controversial French novelist whose first novel, Whatever (1994), depicting the "crushingly boring lives of two computer programmers", inspired the movement known as "depressionism."  Houellebecq is every bit the French contrarian, sparring playfully (but bitingly) with his interviewer as he chain smokes cigarettes unceasingly (the author is reportedly in the middle of an attempt to cut down to four packs a day).  The topics discussed range from a discussion of the author's work, which is influenced by Romanticism and Science Fiction and seeks to capture contemporary truth in an intense and beautiful fashion, to the author's acrimonious relationship with the French literary establishment, to punk rock, to the unique challenges of contemporary life.  An intriguing portrait of a rude and interesting man.

"Virgin"
By April Ayers Lawson.   A young man in a deeply unsatisfying marriage attends a fundraising party with his wife.  Wandering through the halls of the mansion, the man encounters his hostess, with whom he begins an affair.

"Ten Stories from Flaubert"
American author and notorious Francophile Lydia Davis has apparently taken it upon herself to fictionalize a journal belonging to Gustave Flaubert.  The journal is organized into 10 very short stories which have probably been scrupulously researched and tend to be primarily anecdotal in nature.

“The Worm in Philly"
By Sam Lipsyte.  Tells the tale of a cash hungry junkie who arrives at the fantastic idea of writing a children's book about a famous boxer in order to generate cash.  When his plans don't quite pan out as expected, the junkie finds himself caught in an uncomfortable misunderstanding with his supplier.

Sycamore Review
Reviewed by Katrina Aligata

In “Bomb” by Laura van den Berg, in the Sycamore Review, a lady is sharing a cab ride with her ex-husband. They both came from the lawyer’s office. She is going to meet up with her lover at Regent’s Park and he is taking the day off. They are stopped in traffic near an office building. A police officer comes and tells them that there might be something in the building, but they don’t know. The lady starts to have a panic attack and tries to get out of the car. She sticks her head out the window and asks the cop if there is something wrong in the building. And that is the end of the story. In other story “A Story for Mr. Pena” by Diana Lopez, a female middle school teacher is telling of her unpopularity with her fellow colleagues and teachers. She says they never invite her to go drink margaritas with them and they never remember her name. And the kids that she teaches are bored with her style and teaching plan. It seems like she can’t get a break anywhere. But she becomes a hero in the end when a big storm approaches and she has to get all the kids back inside. One girl didn’t hear her instructions and was too close to the tree, but when the limbs have reached the ground she crawls out of them unscathed. She’s taken inside with scratches and no other serious injury.
            It feels like this journal publishes a kind of real life story. Both stories felt like they were from a real person’s life, like the events in each story could, or did, actually happen. And as far as the editorial personality, I feel that it is looking for a story that involves real life events and stories that could be believable. I feel like the editorial personality would be that it wants the readers to be engaged and connected with the stories they read in the journal.